deviant art





Login
Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour Lost Password?
Deviant Login
Shop
 Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
Group Info Group Founded 2 Years ago Statistics 181 Members
10,054 Pageviews199 Watchers

Gallery Folders

Deviants

Monthly Stats

Group Activity
I'd like to give everyone a little bit of information about the Creative Commons options on DeviantArt. Seeing as we are a Creative Commons group, it's very important for everyone here to understand how these licenses work.

Most people just click the little radio button that says "use a creative commons license" and have done with it, but DeviantArt allows as little sharing as possible and is the very opposite of the intent of Creative Commons. If you leave the default settings on then your work will be very limited and not available in the free culture community. Since here, picking the right license is important, we encourage you to think about what you want to allow and change some of the default options.

The general gist of how the deviantArt creative commons buttons work in relation to your art is this:

- "Use a creative commons license" allows people to copy your work and share it, perhaps online or with their friends offline. With only this option submitted, your work may only be used in the original form without any changes and it may not be used commercially. This means nobody can make deviations based on part of your work and limit the people who can use the work. Please try not to stop at enabling only this one.

- "Allow commercial uses of your work" removes the non-commercial restriction and allows people to use your work in conjunction with any commercial enterprise. Most free culture groups (open source etc) don't allow non-commercial restrictions because it harms collaboration. As a rule of thumb if you don't intend to sell your work later on then you should allow commercial use. We have a gallery especially for this type of license, so if you're willing to allow people to use your deviation for their work projects, we'd like you to have a place in our special gallery and to thank you!

- "Allow modifications of your work" is very important. This means people may make derivative works based on your deviation. Without this ticked, nobody may use your deviation to create their own work. If your art has a very specific artistic integrity which is vital then don't allow derivative works.

- "Yes, as long as others share alike" means that anyone who uses your work must also make their derivative work the exact same Creative Commons License. This is the same type of copyleft license that Open Source uses to ensure that everyone, even businesses that use the work, have to play fair. It guarantees that the work will remain free culture. This is what Wikipedia uses.

Here's an example of a deviation which allows maximum freedom of use:
Screenshot of Creative Commons License on DeviantArt

So please, check your licenses, and share!
More Journal Entries

Affiliates

:iconoccupyartists::iconcreativecommons-art::iconpirateparty-da:

Comments


:icon:
Add a Comment:
 
:iconphotocomix2:
i notice so many on DA misunderstand the sense of the CC license

weird see many artwork under CC license and simultaneausly marked by big ugly watermark to avoid that could be reused, still is a very commune practice

--
More on flickr [link]
or for mandala and patterns [link]
Reply
:iconfoxhead128:
~foxhead128 May 17, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I agree. If you're going to slap a watermark on your artwork, then don't bother with Creative Commons.

--
I fail at keeping up with messages, so if I watch you, I'm usually just saying you deserve more than a fave. ^^;

I can also be found elsewhere on the Web.
Reply
:icondoctormo:
*doctormo May 5, 2012  Professional Digital Artist
It's a confusion over what Creative Commons is. The only way is to encourage common knowledge about creative commons and copyright issues.

--
-- DoctorMO --
Reply
:iconphotocomix2:
well i advised a couple of deviants that were putting huge watermark on their CC images, that they should have misunderstand the meaning of the license, and that if they want not share but protect more tightly their copyright they should better do NOT use CC license

the reaction i had was to be accused to lie in attempt to confuse them and so steal more easily their works, to be a troll and so on

honestly after that i will not try again, is DA that should explain welland officially that CC is not a additional way to protect their copyright, but a way to share, but still preserve the right to be credit as author

i believe more than 80% of who here on DA use CC just don't understand what they are doing.

--
More on flickr [link]
or for mandala and patterns [link]
Reply
:icondoctormo:
*doctormo May 5, 2012  Professional Digital Artist
It's true. And most people use completely useless Non-commercial or Non-derivitive terms.

The problem is; we have to be more content with other people using our works, even to the point of making money from them. I know, it's hard for EVERYONE to understand, because we feel so close to our works. But to be fair, it also means we can use other people's work for anything too.

What we retain is credit and the chance to work together more effectively.

--
-- DoctorMO --
Reply
:iconl33tn3rdz:
Mood: Love ~l33tn3rdz Mar 31, 2012  Hobbyist Writer
Someone suggested that creative commons licences should be made mandatory here as a final solution to the art theft problem. Good or bad idea?

--
I am the man who arranges the blocks but Razuvious and Arthas bleed me dry.
But the Death Knights will rise! We will not compromise!
All we know that the old regime must die!
Long live WAR10CK! Kill our lord!
We salute the sickle and sword!
Reply
:iconcymae:
^Cymae Apr 17, 2012  Professional Digital Artist
bad idea, It would probably prevent a lot of artists from submitting anything if they relinquish part of their copyright.

--
For free-to-use model sheets and amazing concept art that you can make awesome 3D from, check out Model Sheet Central
Reply
:icondoctormo:
*doctormo Mar 31, 2012  Professional Digital Artist
Licenses are not meant to solve art theft (as in prevent it), because even with an all-rights-reserved Copyright holding, if someone is viewing the content online then it's already been copied in order to get to the computer it's being viewed on.

In short... the best we can hope for is that using a Creative Commons license encourages people (especially commercial interests) to be a lot more careful about what pieces of creative work they use in ways the creator doesn't want.

--
-- DoctorMO --
Reply
:icondpressedsoul:
^DpressedSoul Feb 16, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
Thank you very much for your request! :aww:

--
This paint-by-numbers life is fucking with my head once again.

CV for Photography/Abstract & Surreal
Founder of #WhoNeedsColour
Reply
:iconzerosumsystem:
:)

--
~ZEROSUMSYSTEM
Reply
:icon:
Add a Comment: